previous article next
Electronics has changed a lot since this research was
done. Today, you would be advised to go buy an Autek RF impedance meter to
reproduce this experiment. The formating was orginally done for a dot-matrix
tractor feed printer so that the print would adhere to University requirements for
page layout.
So some sections look different than others.
Water Content Measurement by Reflected Power Method
Alan Dewey
Associate of Applied Science, Communications-Broadcast Technology, Parkland College,
Champaign, Illinois
Bachelor of Science, Engineering Technology,
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
A Thesis submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science in Manufacturing Systems in the Department of Technology Southern Illinois University at
Carbondale. December 1990
Abstract
A non-destructive, non-invasive method to measure water content of raw materials and finished products is proposed and tested. A radio frequency oscillator provides
a signal to a tuned circuit. The item to be measured is placed inside the inductor
of the tuned circuit. Impedance of theinductor is affected by the complex electromagneticproperties
of the sample and its water content. The magnitude of change of inductor impedance
is determined from its effect on the measured relative transmitted and reflected
signals. From the relative transmitted and reflected signals, the numerical value of Standing Wave Ratio Coefficient (SWR), is determined. The circuitry is simple,
portable, inexpensive and safe. This method could be used to check water content in raw material or finished product,
on-line, off-line, or in storage without need to disturb packaging. Further improvements may develop a device that would provide simple interfacing for closed loop process control.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank Dr. Jefferson Lindsey III for his discussions on electromagnetic theory and Dr. Marek Szary
for suggestions regarding the procedure. The subject of
investigation resulted from suggestions by Dr. Daniel Chavez
of SIU Department of Anatomy. The author also appreciates
the suggestions and comments from Dr. John Gelderd of Texas
A&M University and Dr. Thomas McRae at Laser Imaging
Systems, Inc.
Table of Contents
Abstract ..........................................ii
Acknowledgements ..................................iii
List of Figures ...................................vi
List of Tables ....................................vii
Background ........................................1
Invasive vs. Non-Invasive methods ...............2
Invasive and Destructive Methods ................4
Non-Invasive Methods ............................6
1 Two Electrode Conductance Method ..........6
2 Four Electrode Conductance Method..........8
3 Capacitance Methods .......................9
4 Inductance Methods ........................12
5 Microwave Radio Method ....................16
Background Summary ..............................18
Statement of the Problem ..........................20
The Proposed Method ...............................21
Circuit Principles ..............................24
Experiment Apparatus ............................32
Research Procedure ................................36
Calibration of Equipment ........................36
Acquisition of Data .............................38
Results ...........................................42
Description of Graphs ...........................43
Discussion of Results ...........................49
Future Work .......................................54
Bibliography ......................................56
Appendix A Raw Data ...............................
Vita ..............................................60
List of Figures
Figure 1 Experiment Apparatus .....................31
Figure 2 The Directional Coupler ..................33
Figure 3 Impedance Matching Network ...............33
Figure 4 Comparison of Reflected, Forward
Readings and Standing Wave Ratio (SWR) ...44
Figure 5 SWR vs. Sponge Wet Mass;
Data Point Plot ..........................44
Figure 6 Linear Regression Comparison;
Distilled Water ..........................45
Figure 7 Variance Range ...........................45
Figure 8 Prediction Variance ......................46
Figure 9 Slope Variance ...........................46
Figure 10 Standing Wave Ratio vs.
Saline Solution ..........................47
Figure 11 Wet Mass vs. Natural Logarithm
of SWR ...................................
Figure 12 Comparison; Saline Solution to
Distilled Water ..........................47
Figure 13 SWR vs Saline; Unprepared Sample .........48
vi
List of Tables
Comparison of Ice and Distilled Water ............
Background Information
Long range success in manufacturing requires attention to quality. Where water content affects the quality of the finished product, or the processing of raw material, this
variable
must be quantified for application to process control. Continuous adjustment to a
process based on data from the results of that process is possible only with
timely
information. This is fundamental to closed loop process control.
The significance of a product's water content varies
with situation. Effects may be simple, for example, causingvariation in the curing time of an adhesive, drying time of paint, or the shelf life of finished goods and work inprocess. Of safety concern might be the strength of ceramic or engineered materials when related to moisture content.Results of moisture may be more serious. For example, nitrogen
tetroxide rocket fuel becomes highly corrosive withonly a few tenths percent water content.
1
Water content measurement techniques of varying
accuracy, range, speed and application have found widespread use based upon the characteristics of the product or process. The choice of technique involves the consideration of:
- the form of the material, i.e. liquid, solid, or
gas;
- the range of measurement capability required of the
instrument;
- portability;
- cost;
- time frame
allowed to obtain results;
- safety;
- level of operator
skill required; and other factors.
Most existing production line inspection sampling techniques are boring and human inspectors are susceptible to tiring and occasions of inattentiveness, especially for repetitive, simple tasks. 2
Machines do not exhibit these characteristics, making reliable, repetitive 100% inspection
a feasible undertaking. Furthermore, destructive and invasive testing allow only a sample of the product to be tested,
as in explosives and ammunitions. Thus the ideal combination is machine controlled non-destructive 100% evaluation.
With computer control of inspection, and proper data acquisition and interfacing, accurate measurements maybe made in a time frame suitable for closed
loop process
control. 3 Further, statistical
analysis of the process maybe simultaneously generated. 4
A review of basic methods of moisture measurement illustrates the properties
of water that enable its measurement. Each method has certain advantages and disadvantages.
The method chosen in any particular situation is based upon required accuracy, simplicity, and form of the material. The concepts of conductivity, magnetic permeability and
dielectric constant are demonstrated.
Invasive vs. Non-Invasive
Testing methods that remove a sample of the product to be measured may or may not be considered destructive. For example, to remove a one inch core sample from a 12
inchwooden beam may not significantly alter the usefulness or life of the member. Yet, removal of a one inch core from a 2 inch board will render it useless as a structural member. In each case, though, core removal is invasive. In the monitoring
of soil moisture, for example, a device may be inserted to the desired depth for measurements. Monitoring humidity in concrete may involve implantation of a thermocouple
probe. These also, while not destructive in these applications, do belong in the category of invasive techniques.
This paper will consider methods that are either destructive or invasive in a category
distinct from those that are truly non-invasive and non-destructive.
Invasive and Destructive Methods
The most accurate method of water content measurement of any solid is to determine physically the mass of water that may be removed. Such a procedure is always destructive, but this provides a basis to which all other methods are calibrated. Water content
as expressed by percent weight may be easily calculated by completely drying the
sample and determining mass of the water removed. This may be accomplished by weighing
before and after oven drying.
Another method involves anhydrous methanol to extract all water from grain. Obtain a sample of the product or the raw material, assume homogeneity, use the methanol to remove the water and then calculate the content as a percentage of total mass.
An invasive method that provides continuous monitoring of moisture content depends on the property of certain materials to expand dimensionally with increase in moisture
content.
This method was used by Elda De Castro in Portugal for soil measurements. 5 The dimensional changes of woodstrips may be monitored electronically as the change in their length directly increases or decreases the
tension in a vibrating wire. Changes in tension cause the resonant frequency of the wire to vary proportionately (as in tuning an electric guitar string).
The assembly of wood strips, once calibrated, may be inserted into the soil. With time, the moisture
within the wood strips will reach equilibrium with their surrounding environment
and the output of the device may be monitored constantly. After data are compensated
for temperature, the change in length of the wood strips due to moisture is known,
and correlated to the water content of the soil. However this method does require
inserting the device into the material to be measured.
Another method requiring implantation is the plaster of paris block. Bouyoucos 6 has written several articles
describing
the use of two electrodes cast in plaster of paris block. The block absorbs and releases moisture in relation to its surroundings. The electrical resistance
between these electrodes indicates water content of the soil. Because this method measures water
within the block,there is no need to correct for variations in soil density. These and other methods requiring a device to absorb or release moisture to attain equilibrium with the environs exhibit significant hysteresis. Because of the hysteresis, absolute values of moisture content cannot be determined without
knowing whether the water content of the substance has been increasing or decreasing.
Invasive moisture measurement also may be made utilizing thermocouples and heaters.
7,8 The device is implanted in the material. The rate at which the temperature will rise in a porous material is related, among other things, to total water content. By measuring the rate at
which temperature increases upon application of known heat quantities, or by measuring heat required to raise the temperature a specific amount, the water content may be derived.
The thermocouple, plaster block, and wood strip methods of moisture measurement cannot distinguish between water or other permeating liquids.
Because invasive and destructive methods of moisture measurement destroy or alter the item, there is an economic loss for each measurement performed. Further, the
manufacturer
monitoring incoming, process, or outgoing
quality is limited to sampling inspection.
Non-Invasive Methods
Non-inasive water content measurement also encompasses various methods. These include
measuring the electrical capacitance effects of the sample, inductance effects,
the attenuation
of microwave radio energy, or direct measurement of conductivity. More time consuming methods include infra-red spectroscopy. 9 The physical attributes of the material
will usually preclude certain methods. Methods utilizing electrodes may fall in the non-destructive
category, yet most would not be usable once a product has been packaged, or before raw materials are uncrated at the shipping dock.
1) Two Electrode Method
A two electrode conductivity method similar to that used in the plaster of paris
block method described earlier, where the electrodes are placed upon the material,
not inserted within, would be non-destructive and non-invasive, though not feasible once the product is packaged.
The ohmmeter is a two terminal device that provides
voltage
on two electrodes. Any non-insulator connected between the electrodes will
then allow some amount of current flow. The magnitude of the current flow is directly
proportional to conductance. Since conductance increases with increasing water content,
a correlation can be derived for this effect.
Direct measurement of conductivity must be accomplished by physical contact of the
electrodes and the material under test. The material being tested dictates the type of electrodes used. Loose materials that are powdered or granular might be put into cells. Wood may require the electrodes in the form of clamps. Surface electrodes may be used if the object has sufficient conductivity to provide low contact resistance.
However direct measurement of conductance is affected by variations in materials
which are
not homogeneous. Temperature, packing density, and electrode contact resistance are also problems. 10 However,
not only changes in water content affect the conductance. Other factors include mineral content of the water, salt content, temperature, electrode size, pressure
with which the electrodes are attached, distance between attachment points, and the frequency at which the measurement is performed. These variables significantly
limit the accuracy of the two electrode methods. For liquids, however, many of these factors can be controlled by using electrodes produced for uniform size, shape, and spacing, and by always performing the measurements at a specific frequency.
Two electrode wood moisture meters are available commercially. Plans for a simple two electrode conductance wood moisture meter kit are given and use of such a meter is demonstrated in an article in Popular Electronics. 11 This article shows the simplicity of the equipment and procedure. Operated by battery and a one transistor meter circuit, the
electrodes are two nails that are pressed into the wood.
However, no mention is made in the article of the variable readings that will be obtained with differing penetration
of the electrodes into the wood.
Two electrode methods as described here are not the same as the capacitive method described later. Capacitance measurements do not require physical contact with the
sample.
2) Four Electrode Conductance Method
An improvement over two electrodes is the four electrode method. In this case, two
electrodes placed upon the material are used to inject a known constant alternating
current into the sample. The current is independent of electrode contact resistance, temperature, spacing of
electrodes, frequency or even the conductivity of the sample.
Two more electrodes electrically isolated from the first pair are used to measure the voltage difference at two points a specified distance apart. Both of these electrodes
are
placed between the current-supplying pair. Note that these electrodes are placed
on the surface of the material, not embedded. Thus, there is no invasion of the sample required. By using a bridge type circuit, no current is required to flow
in the voltage measurement electrodes. Thus, this measurement is also independent
of electrode contact resistance. To illustrate the non-destructive nature of the
four electrode method, consider that measurements were performed on live humans as early as the 1930s. 12 Moreover, this method is still commonly used today. Using a constant 800 microAmp rms current at 100 kHz, measurements from hand to
foot correlate to total body water in the subject.
13
Biologists refer to this as Bioelectric Impedance Analysis.
When the electrodes are placed closer together, across a finger or leg, the changes in conductivity due to blood pulsations can be measured and recorded.
Development of the four electrode method revealed that
the magnitude of whole body impedance varies with frequency. Thus measurements using the four electrode method must also
be performed at a constant
frequency.
3) Capacitance Methods
Use of electrical capacitance to measure water content is based on the significant
difference between the dielectric constant of water and that of most solids. Dielectric
constant is the nature of the medium between two plates of a capacitor to alter
the value of the electron forces between the plates. Any insulating medium within the electric
field of a capacitor alters the electron charge to voltage ratio (the capacitance) of these plates. The degree of this effect, expressed as ratio to the capacitance value in a perfect vacuum, is known as the dielectric constant. 14,15 For example, if the air (relative dielectricconstant = 1.0) between two capacitor plates is completely
replaced
with water, the value of capacitance now exhibited by these same plates is increased by a factor of approximately 80.
An alternating electric field of known voltage may be applied to two plates of a capacitor to excite currents in the item to be measured. Electrically, the resistive
component
of the induced current (in phase with voltage) and capacitive component of the current (leads voltage by 90
o ) will then exist in parallel within the material. The net phase
angle of current is the vector sum of the capacitive and resistive components. This
phase angle may be measured, along with the magnitude of the current, to determine the net capacitance.
The magnitude of the capacitive component of the current decreases with decreasing frequency, whereas the resistive component of the current does not, so that below
approximately one MHz, determination of the capacitive component becomes difficult.
16 Frequencies above 100 MHz are not suitable either. At frequencies greater than this,the water molecules do not follow the signal. 17
Most capacitance type meters employ bridge circuits. These consist of accurate oscillators and components. The bridge employs a variable capacitor with a calibrated dial.
The circuit is adjusted to bring the bridge into balance, as indicated by a meter.
The reading from the adjustable capacitor is used to determine capacitance of the
external capacitor. The dial may be calibrated to read directly in terms of moisture
content of a specific type of material. Another technique utilizes the test capacitor
as part of a resonant circuit. Changes in the capacitance affect the resonant frequency
of the oscillator which may be determined by a frequency meter. This method is applied
in grain moisture meters.
Most solids exhibit dielectric constants less than 8, whereas water is slightly
more than 80. 18 This great
difference permits a correlation between capacitance and water
content. Capacitive methods of moisture measurement are quite popular in measurements of grain and wood. For these methods, in which the material being measured is placed between the plates
of the capacitor, the total mass must be known. The capacitive method does not differentiate
water molecules from those of the material. What is measured is the total dielectric
effect on the capacitor. Therefore, either a specific mass is placed in the test
chamber, or a correction chart is used for the actual mass measured.
Similar in construction to the two electrodes in plaster of paris block by Bouyoucos discussed earlier, is one by J.Flectcher
19 that embeds two brass plates of a capacitor in the plaster of paris
block. Fletcher measures the change in capacitance of the block to determine percentage
of soil moisture. The moisture content determined in this manner is said to be immune to water conductivity variations caused by minerals in the water. 20 However the block must absorb water from the soil, and therefore must be inserted into the earth, which puts this method in the invasive category.
A non-invasive capacitive probe system for detecting moisture
is detailed by Outwater which provides relative readings. 21 This device used a capacitive probe made from
two
concentric tubes of brass. The end of the probe is placed on the surface of
the item being tested. The net capacitance of the probe is affected by the dielectric
characteristics of the material, and of any moisture present. Since the distance
from probe to water affects the measurement as well as the quantity of water, no
quantitative data will result. The unique aspect of this device is not the probe (which has performance limitations) but the method of detecting changes in its capacitance.
Whereas most capacitive detectors use either Wheatstone or L-C (inductor- capacitor) bridges, this circuit uses two identical resonant circuits with the exception of
the capacitive
probe. With only dry air near the probe, the circuits are balanced and no meter indication is noted. Any imbalance in the test circuit caused by dielectric
effects or variance in conductivity, will alter the balance of the system and deflect the meter.
Despite the lack of quantitative information, this device has proven useful in determining the extent of water penetration in fiberglass rocket motor cases. Graphs connecting
plots of identical readings provided indication of water invasion contours. Repeating the measurements and graphing at regular time intervals showed propagation of water
in the medium.
4) Inductance Methods
Another method that does not require the attachment of electrodes to the sample
utilizes the properties of an
inductor. When a conductor is wound in a helical shape, its inductance is increased and may be calculated. Such
components are referred to simply as coils. A varying
current in the conductor varies the magnetic field about
each turn of the helix. This varying current creates a varying magnetic field
which affects the current flowing in
adjacent turns.
Presta et. al 22 used a large solenoidal coil driven with
a 5-MHz radio frequency current and a human subject placed
internally. The difference between coil impedance empty and
with the subject inside is an index of the conductivity of
the subject. It is this conductivity that correlates to the
water content of the subject. By combining this information
with height, weight and sex of the subject, the total body
water can be predicted. The reference method for total body water measurements in live humans is by weighing
the subject
in air and under water. Correlation of this inductive
method with the hydrostatic weighing measurement was 0.903
with a confidence level (1-P) of .0001. The article
describing this work does not state by what method the coi impedance
is determined.
Tarjan and McFee 23 used electrostatically shielded coils operating at 100 kHz to measure conductivity changes
of the
human thorax and head due to pulsatile blood flow. The
shielding was designed to eliminate the electrostatic field effects, allowing only measurement of magnetic
properties of the subject. One coil was driven with the 100 kHz signal.
Two more coils placed coaxially, one on each side of the
driven coil, were attached in opposing phase (180 0
) to detect variations in the magnetic field as it was changed by the varying volume
of blood within the subject. Although this system was highly sensitive to motion
of the subject,
and required very careful construction of the coils, the
device provided graphical records of varying blood volume
within the body as low as 0.05%.
It is important to understand that the use of conductivity to measure body fluid
in humans is possible
because the chemical balance of bodily fluids is maintained
within narrow tolerances. Thus the conductivity of the body fluids is fairly constant. Conversely, pure water is an extremely poor conductor and its quantity
would not be
measurable by conductivity methods alone.
Magnetic induction is also used to measure fluid conductivity for laboratory or
manufacturing process
chemicals. One type of commercially produced conductivity
meter induces alternating current into the solution using toroidal coils. 24 A second coil picks up the magnetic signal
created by this current induced in the fluid. Toroidal core coils are self shielding, so only magnetic fields are detected by the pickup coil. So the output ofthe detection
coil depends on the magnitude of the induced current. If the fluid within the field
of the excitation coil has no conductivity, no current will be induced and therefore
no magnetic field will be coupled to the pick upcoil. A conductive fluid will complete
a magnetic path between the coils. The magnitude of the detected signal is proportional
to the conductivity of the solution.
Differences in dielectric constants will not directly affect the magnitude of the detected signal. However, these measurements
must be compensated for temperature because conductivity of some solutions may have temperature coefficients as high as 4%. 25
Note that the inductive methods described herein are based upon the conductivity of the solutions, not magnetic permeability. Failure to understand the difference between conductivity effects on a magnetic field and permeability effects may lead one to believe that inductance methods would not be practical. Nyboer 26
"Unfortunately, physicists indicate that the magnetic permeability of tissues is
essentially the same as the air space with which it competes. Our conclusion is therefore that there is no support for construction of a direct plethysmograph based upon
the inductive characteristics of body tissues which are ionic and not electronic conductors distributed essentially in a parallel relation to the surrounding space."
Halsted,, 27 in his book on aqueous dielectrics, states; "The magnetic properties of the moist substance are rarely of importance." These statements discounting inductive methods not only ignore that the conductivity of the moist sample can affect inductors, but that the effects of dielectrics on the distributed capacitance of inductors can be measured.
If an unshielded inductor is used to induce current in a material, and the impedance
of the coil is simultaneously monitored, then it is possible to measure effects
on the coil due to the dielectric properties of the sample, as well as those due
to its conductivity. Such a method would detect not only variations in quantity of water present in a sample, but also variations in conductivity or dielectric
constant
which might also be caused by contamination of thesample.
5) Microwave Radio Methods
Though capacitance methods use frequencies from 1 to 100 MHz, measurements of moisture
content may be performed at
frequencies on the order of GHz (GigaHertz = 1000 MHz) by determining the amount of electromagnetic radiation
absorbed. Microwave signals are attenuated by water at a
linear rate, expressed in decibels, per unit thickness of
water. This relationship holds until the water content is
so high that there exists free water as well as bound.
28 Thus, for any given frequency, distance of measurement
and material, the signal attenuation is proportional to water content.
James et al 29 used 4.81 GHz microwave electromagnetic
radiation to measure moisture content of sawn wood. The microwave signal was transmitted through the wood and
reflected back to the detector by a rotating dipole antenna.
The strength of the signal detected, after the round trip
through the wood, was attenuated in proportion to water
content. By spinning the reflecting antenna at 9,000 rpm, the grain angle of the wood could
also be determined. This
information was used to predict the strength of the wood.
Although this method provides consistent measurements, it
requires expensive microwave radio generators and careful
alignment of the complicated arrangement of equipment.
Further problems include the confounding reflections of signal from surrounding
objects and complicated data reduction.
Background Summary
Reliability of field use measurement equipment is
reduced by complexity. Elimination or reduction of
environmentally sensitive circuitry, while maintaining performance levels, will have economic advantages.
Reduction in quantity and complexity of operating controls
eases operation, reduces operator training time, and lowers
the probability of mistakes.
As described here, accurate and repeatable methods of non-destructive, non-invasive
moisture measurement include
four electrode, capacitance, microwave radio attenuation,
and magnetic permeability methods. The two electrode
conductance method is inaccurate. Four electrode methods
are not suitable for use with packaged items as the
electrodes require direct contact with the item. Microwave
methods, while accurate, are expensive, bulky, and require
reasonable operator skill. While this may be adaptable to
automatic operation by machine, there still exists the
problems of signal reflection and expense.
Measurements of conductivity by induced current have
been applied in medical research to measure blood flow and total body water, but have not been applied to determine
moisture content of products, processes or raw materials. Overall, the performance
of the capacitive methods are
suited to closed loop process control and unattended
operation. Many of the circuits are very accurate with good
repeatability. However, whether the circuit uses a
frequency counter, or uses the test capacitor in a bridge
circuit, requires that the capacitor itself become part of an oscillator. Many components of the circuit, in addition to the test capacitor,
require temperature compensation. This increases design cost and production
cost of the
instrument. Component aging increases the frequency of
calibration checks and alignment.
Statement of the Problem
One hundred percent inspection of finished product or raw material for a manufacturing
environment requires non-destructive methods. Sampling inspection, as in the
case of warehoused material, is less practical if unit
packaging must be disturbed or removed. Methods which can determine moisture content without physical invasion
of the
packaging preserve integrity of the product or raw material. If the measurement
system is also sensitive to fluid
conductivity, this would provide the additional benefit of
detecting contamination by salts or minerals that alter the fluid conductivity.
Methods which do not require physical contact with the sample, such as the capacitive
and microwave methods, require high component count with temperature compensation.
Additionally, the microwave method, at present, is
expensive. A method which requires fewer temperature dependent components and overall lower cost would expand
manufacturers abilities to monitor and improve product quality.
The Proposed Method
The method proposed here utilizes the relationship between radio frequency energy
reflected from the termination of a transmission line and the impedance of that
termination. The termination, in this project will be a solenoidal coil. This method
reduces the number of
components that must be temperature compensated. Overall cost
would be lower than resonant frequency measuring
circuits or bridge circuits. Operation would be as simple
and safe as currently available capacitance methods.
Improvement of the method could reduce to two, the component
count affecting calibration.
The circuit for this procedure uses a solenoidal coil driven by a radio frequency
signal fed through a directional coupler and an impedance matching network. The
sample to be measured is placed within the coil. The sample, and water within that
sample, will affect the net impedance of the
coil. A change in the impedance will thus create a mismatch
between the transmission line carrying the signal and the
impedance matching network feeding the coil. Such a
mismatch will reflect signal back toward the source. The relative reading of power from the signal source and
the relative reading of reflected power will be measured by a directional coupler
and recorded. The ratio of the power from the signal source to the reflected signal
power is expected to relate to moisture content of the material under test.
The nature of the reflected power method proposed here
does not require routine calibration of the meter or output
level of the signal source because the objective of the measurement is solely to determine the ratio of the
magnitudes of signal through the directional coupler. A directional coupler is a device that provides
a d.c. voltage
output in proportion to the signal propagating through the
transmission line. Two outputs from the directional coupler
are provided. One output signal each represents the signal
traveling in each direction through the coupler.
Circuitry is very simple and stable. Only one meter and
one measuring circuit are used for both the forward and
reverse readings. The user only operates one switch and
notes the two readings. Moreover, the circuit can be built
with few components and simple controls.
The experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. For this
procedure the media investigated was a cellulose sponge.
Water was applied incrementally via a syringe to the sponge for measurement. To
permit consistent placement of the sponge within the coil, a carrier was made from
foam wrap-around
pipe insulation with internal diameter of 13/16inch, outside diameter of 1.75 inches.
The outside diameter was trimmed by knife for a sliding fit within the coil form.
Alignment marks were cut on the outside surface of the carrier to aid in consistent placement of the carrier within the coil, and of the sponge within
the carrier. The cavity within the foam held the sponge securely. This foam was of the closed cell type which prevented absorption of water. A lengthwise cut through the foam provided easy insertion and removal of the sponge.
It is not the use of an inductor that is unique to this research. It is the method
of measuring the changes in impedance and circuit loss that is investigated. The
reflected
power method should be applicable to a circuit utilizing a capacitive test cell replacing the inductor.
Circuit Principles
Changes in the circuit impedance due to the differing net conductivity of the test sample, together with the dielectric effects, will determine the magnitude and phase
angle
of power reflected. The directional coupler provides a d.c. voltage output that is
dependent only upon themagnitude of signal reflected from the circuit. Phase angle does
not directly affect the output voltage.
A solenoidal winding of wire exhibits inductance related to its diameter, length and number of turns of wire.
However, capacitance exists between all turns of the wire throughout the length of the coil. Known as distributed capacitance, this additional reactance is effectively inparallel with the inductor. Proximity of a dielectric to the turns of wire of
the coil will increase the value of this capacitance.
The parallel (inductor and distributed capacitance) circuit impedance depends upon
frequency. Maximum impedance occurs at the frequency where the capacitive impedance
and inductive impedance are equal but opposite. This frequency is known as the self
resonance frequency of the inductor. A change in the capacitance of the coil circuit
changes the overall impedance of the coil. This also means that the frequency of
self resonance is changed. Thus the self resonance frequency could measured as an
indicator of water content. Determination of self resonance frequency requires a
frequency counter or some other device to monitor the oscillation rate, and that
the coil be part of the oscillator circuit. At a fixed frequency, though, a change
in the impedance of the coil also changes the impedance at the input to the matching
network. This impedance change causes a change in reflected power.
The dielectric and conductivity effects of the foam carrier will be a constant in
this experiment, as will be the effects of the acrylic coil form. Salt content has no effect on dielectric constant.
31 However the salt content will affect conductivity, which in turn affects
the magnitude of the current induced. Given a fixed dielectric constant and quantity
of water within the sample, changes in its conductivity will also vary the inductance
of the coil and cause a corresponding change in the reflected power.
Conductivity is defined as conductance per unit volume. Thus, a homogeneous sample
will have a certain conductivity regardless of its dimensions or volume. However, the conductance
of that sample is determined by its dimensions. Therefore, an increase
in water content of a sample will increase the net value of conductance. Without dimensional
changes, an increase in the quantity of conductive fluid within the internal spaces of the sample, will increase its conductivity. This results in a relationship between
water content and conductance. A conductive material within the field of the coil lowers its inductance.
The magnetic field produced by the coil will induce
non-uniform currents in the sample. The periphery will have greater current than more internal sections of the
sample. (The 'skin effect') If the water within the sample is not uniformly distributed, erroneous data may result. For this reason it is intended for use with materials that are homogeneous.
With proper impedance match, all transmitted power delivered to the matching network
will be radiated as radio frequency energy or dissipated as heat by circuit losses,
resulting
in no reflected power. This will result in an indication of zero reflected power by the directional coupler. Any changes in impedance due to the electromagnetic
properties of objects within the electromagnetic field of the coil will alter the
line to load impedance match. When load impedance does not match the characteristic
impedance of the transmission line, some portion of the arriving signal is reflected back toward thesource. The ratio r of reflected voltage to incident voltage is; 32
(note that the formulas did not reproduce correctly when
this file was imported.)
Z r - Z o Z r = Load impedance
r = ------- (1)
Zr + Z o Z o = Line impedance
The amount of reflected voltage, which is determined by the ratio of mismatch in
impedance, will relate to the net electromagnetic properties of the sample. The
reflection coefficient
may only have values from -1 to 1. Whether the sign of r is positive or negative is determined by the relation of the impedance mismatch. When load impedance is greater than the transmission line impedance, r will be positive,
and when load impedance is lower than the transmission line impedance, r will be negative. Thus,determination
of r requires determining either the true impedance
ratio, not just the ratio magnitude, or determination of the phase of the reflected voltage.Another method of expressing impedance mismatch is known as Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR). It is simple to measure the ratio of signal magnitude travelling
toward the source to the magnitude of reflected signal. The formula for VSWR is;
33
power reflected
1+ power forward
VSWR= ------------------- (2)
power reflected
1- power forward
VSWR may also be calculated in terms of voltage;
34
V o +V r V o = forward voltage
VSWR= ----- (3)
V o -V r V r = reflected voltage
The output of the monimatch directional coupler is in terms of volts, so that use of formula (3) is most appropriate. Note that VSWR must always be equal to or greater
than 1.Throughout the remainder of this paper this ratio will be called simply SWR.
The monimatch type directional coupler, shown in Figure 2, is a simple device which
can determine the ratio of forward to reflected voltages. Construction and circuitry
are
very simple and low cost. Electrically, the monimatch consists of a section
of transmission line with two sections of transmission line for sampling terminated
at one end by a resistor matching the characteristic impedance of the line,and at the other by a diode rectifier. Note that the monimatch does not measure the voltage
directly. A small portion of the signal is coupled into the sampling lines.
With reasonable construction tolerances, the efficiency of each sampling section will be equal. Thus, the true ratio of forward to reflected signals can be determined
without knowledge
of the actual voltages.
The impedance matching network, Figure 3, is used to match the 52 ohm characteristic
impedance of RG-58/AU coaxial cable to the high impedance of the test coil circuit.
In the experimental setup, the impedance matching circuit is connected to the test
coil by a length of coaxial
cable.
The impedance matching network introduces a unknown phase shift into the signal path. Thus, the electrical distance (expressed in terms of wavelength or degrees phase shift) between the directional coupler and the test coil is unknown. Theoretically, the electrical distance between the directional coupler and the test coil will not
affect determination of SWR. Whether the directional coupler is located at a voltage maximum or a voltage minimum, the ratio of forward to reflected power remains constant (assuming lossless
transmission line). However, nonlinearity of the directional
coupler rectifying diodes may produce differing results under such circumstances.
Initial investigation of apparatus performance used commercially produced hermetically sealed quartz crystal oscillators. These oscillators are available from numerous
sources
under $10. A 7 pole Chebyshev low pass filter was constructed and connected
to each oscillator. Output from the low pass filter was found to be approximately
4 mW. This
circuit provided a stable, low cost, battery powered signal source. However
this power level was found to be much too low for use with an experimental setup of this sensitivity.
It was discovered that the coil impedance matching network
could not be adjusted accurately or with any repeatability. Also, oscillator output
this low required direct connection to the directional coupler with no isolation possible. Changes in load impedance caused signal voltage variations at the filter
output. By using a transmitter
adjusted to 14 watts output as a signal source,a 10 dB attenuator could be added, reducing signal power to1.4 watts nominal delivered to the impedance matching network.
The attenuator provides a degree of isolation between the transmitter and the varying
net impedance of the load.
This isolation, in addition to automatic level control
within
the transmitter, provided constant forward signal level.
Following are some possible causes of variance in the reflected power method of
water content measurement. Some factors may be easily controlled in the laboratory, but all should be given due consideration before application to field use.
1. Heating; Some portion of the electromagnetic energy radiated by the coil will
be absorbed in the sample undertest. Resistance of the sample transforms current flowing within into heat. (Resistance is that portion of the inverse of conductance
which causes current to be in phase with voltage.)
Incidental (forward transmitted) power is 1.4 Watts. Thus, the maximum possible
rate at which heat may be added to the sample can be calculated. Converting to calories;1
Joule = 4.1902 calorie 35
1.4 W= 1.4 Joule/second
(1.4 J/s)x(4.1902 cal/J)= 5.866 cal/second If all power
from the radio frequency source were to be absorbed by the sample, heat would increase
by 5.86 calorie/second. Although not all power delivered to the coil will be absorbed by the sample under test, noticeable heating occurs with
small amounts of water.
The effect of heating may be kept small by obtaining the reading quickly. The magnitude of this variable will be relatively smaller with increases in mass of the sample.
Temperature changes of small amounts would not put this procedure in the destructive
method category. Also, it is the conductivity of the sample that will be affected. At the power level used here, temperature changes will not be great enough to yield significant effects on dielectric constant. Conductivity changes, however may be significant with certain fluids.
2. Mechanical changes; Changes in ambient temperature will alter mechanical dimensions of the device, which in turn will affect the electrical characteristics of the circuitry.
Much of this can be compensated by "re-zeroing" the device periodically. This requires only a trimming adjustment of the capacitor in the impedance matching circuit. Dimensional changes due to ambient temperature fluctuations should not be a problem in the laboratory.
3. Ambient atmosphere; Changes in atmospheric humidity will vary the amount of total
water in the test coil magnetic field. This effect should be small compared to the
volume
of water within some types of products. Such a change would also be inherently slow enough to permit compensation by periodic recalibration or use of correction
tables.
Effects of ambient atmosphere humidity are not discussed in literature relevant to moisture content measurement of solids.
4. Motion; this technique is sensitive to motion of the sample. Within the laboratory
environment this is of no concern. However, use of the inductor to measure moisture
of a product on the production line would require that each sample be brought to a complete stop, or that the detection coil move with the sample.
5. External effects; Items outside the coil of wire, but within the magnetic field
will also affect the net inductance of the circuit. These effects can be minimized
by
proper shielding of the device.
6. Cables; Once an equation or graphical method of determining moisture is generated for the device, neither cable length nor type may be changed. These factors will
affect the reflected power ratio for a given impedance change at the coil.
Experiment Apparatus
Dimensions of the coil were chosen by experimentation to provide achievable impedance matching and overall physical size suitable to test small samples. A lathe was used tocut 40 pipe threads per inch for a length of 6.0 inches on an acrylic form of 2.25 inches outside diameter and 2.00 inches inside diameter. Enameled wire of gauge 28 was secured in the groove for a total of 240 turns.
Calculating the inductive impedance of this coil by standard published formula 36 :
d 2 n 2 d= diameter in inches
L (microHenry)= ------- l= coil length in inches
18d+40l n= number of turns
= 1039 microHenry
AWG 28 wire is 0.01264 inch in diameter.
37 The threads cutin the coil form space
each turn of wire uniformly 0.025 inches apart.
Self resonance frequency of the empty coil was found by feeding a sine wave signal from a function generator (B & K model 3011A) through a 100 kOhm resistor to the empty coil. Using an oscilloscope to monitor coil voltage, the signal generator
frequency was increased from 100 kHz to 2 MHz.
Maximum voltage, which indicates resonance, was found to occur at 712 kHz.
Signal source for the experiment was a 10-100 Watt adjustable output transmitter set to 7.0260 MHz (see Figure1). Automatic level control circuitry within the transmitter
stabilized output power. The frequency was chosen somewhat arbitrarily during preliminary trials for a balance between overall sensitivity of the directional coupler and sensitivity of the coil circuit. Sensitivity of the directional coupler increases
with frequency. However attempts to use significantly higher frequencies resulted
in excessive sensitivity of the system to positioning of the cables and components, and proximity of the experimenter.
Additionally higher frequencies (above 11 MHz) resulted in impedances beyond the
range of the impedance matching network.
The 7.026 MHz radio frequency signal was then fed via 52ohm solid dielectric coaxial cable (Belden 8240 RG-58/AU) through a 10 dB attenuator to the directional coupler
and an impedance matching network. The directional coupler was constructed of a 11.2 inch segment of brass rod with two11.2" terminated sections of brass rod placed 0.125" distant in parallel and diametrically opposite the transmission line. The brass lines were supported by and passed through plexiglass spacers. The coupling lines were terminated by 510 ohm 1/4 watt carbon film resistors in series with 500
ohm potentiometers to provide for precise null adjustments.
Detection was by two 1N34A germanium diodes, one for each sampling line. The directional
coupler assembly is mounted within a one inch square brass chassis 12 inches in length. The
impedance matching network is comprised of a T-network high pass filter
with adjustable capacitors and a continuously variable inductor. The output of the T-networkis fed to a 1:4 (input impedance to output impedance) ratio balanced to unbalanced toroidal transformer for connection to the balanced feed line which carries the signal to the test coil. Maximum value of inductance is 18 microHenry and the
capacitors maximum values are 340 picofarad.
Research Procedure
Calibration of Equipment
The directional coupler was matched to the impedance of the transmission line by
adjustment of the sampling line termination resistors. A 52 ohm non-inductive coaxial load resistor was connected to the output of the directional coupler, and the input
of the coupler connected to the transmitter output. The transmitter was set for
30.0 MHz and power output of approximately 14 watts (75 volts p-p) as measured by oscilloscope. The terminating potentiometer for the reflected direction was then adjusted for 0.00 volt indication. Signal frequency was varied from 1.0 to 30.0
MHz in 1 MHz increments while the digital voltmeter was monitored to ensure no frequency dependent effects.
Connections to the coupler were swapped and the procedure repeated for adjustment
of the other sampling line.
After removing the terminating resistor from the line,
the
10 db attenuator, impedance matching network and test coil were connected to the transmitter. At this point the impedance matching network was adjusted by trial
and error until 0.012 volts reflected reading was obtained. Forward power sample reading was 1.567 volts. Once proper impedance match was found, as indicated by minimum reflected signal, no further adjustments were made.
Acquisition of Data
The media for investigation was a section of Arrow Brand "Genuine Cellulose" household sponge. No further information regarding the make-up of the sponge was given on
the
package, and no tests were performed to determine it sactual composition. From this was cut a section of rectangular shape with dimensions 4x1x1 inches. The sponge
had
been rinsed repeatedly during preliminary trials. One of the purposes of these trials was to determine a useful frequency and technique for inserting the carrier.
Before each
run of the experiment, the sponge was wrung damp dry and then placed in a microwave
oven for further drying.
Care was taken to allow the sponge to cool between each heating
cycle of 30 seconds, so that the sponge would not be damaged.
The sponge was dried in this manner until stiff. Mass of the sponge was then determined by weighing
on a torsion balance (Torbal model IL-11) indicating in 0.1 gram increments.
The sponge was then inserted into the foam carrier and aligned with the placement marks. The carrier, with sponge, was then inserted into the coil until centered, as indicated by a groove cut into the carrier which aligned with the edgeof the coil form. The meter is then switched to the reflected signal output from the directional
coupler. This reading is recorded and the switch toggled so that the meter indicates
forward signal. This indication was likewise recorded. To reduce unnecessary heating of the sponge, the carrier and sponge are immediately withdrawn from the coil. A
3 cc syringe, graduated in 0.1 cc increments was used to draw 1.0 cc purchased sodium free distilled drinking water. All water for the experiment was taken from the sameone
gallon container. The water was applied to the sponge across its length through the longitudinal slit opening in the foam carrier. The water in the sponge was allowed
to disperse for a minimum of 30 seconds. Then the carrier was re-inserted into the
coil and reflected and forward measurements again recorded. Water was observed escaping
from the sponge into the carrier after application of 21 cc total during trials 1 and 2. To avoid collection of data beyond the water capacity of the sponge, subsequent runs would cease at approximately 20 grams total mass of the wetsponge.
The procedure was repeated for a total 12 runs. Each time the sponge is dried, weighed, and the mass recorded. Recorded data were entered into a computer spreadsheet for
calculation of SWR and "wet mass", the mass of the sponge at beginning of trial, plus number of cc's water added.
Data were also obtained for 0.9 percent saline solution applied to a similar size sponge cut from the same larger sponge
as the distilled water runs. Saline solution was used to investigate the effect of conductivity on the system.
Rather than use some arbitrary salinity, the value
chosen (0.9%) is that of normal physiological saline. By simulating the conductivity of body fluids, one may infer from
the data obtained, the possible application of the SWR method to biological measurements as in the manner performed by Presta et. al. 39
To prepare the saline solution, 100 grams water was weighed and put into a 1 liter container. This was repeated 9 times to provide 1 kilogram of distilled water. This
method
was necessitated by the 110 gram maximum capacity of the balance. To this was added 9 grams of iodine free table salt. The container was shaken vigorously initially and 3 more times at one hour intervals, then left undisturbe dovernight.
This saline solution was used on the next sponge in the same procedure as that described
for distilled water, with the exception that drying was by compression in a 4" bench
vise
only. First the sponge was rinsed with saline solution and compressed in the vice, this cycle then repeated twice more. The sponge was not dried by microwave
oven and each trial was begun immediately after compression so that evaporation
was kept at a minimum. This modification of procedure would reduce the likely increase in saline contentof the wet sponge with each following trial. The remainder of the procedure
was the same as for the preceding trial using distilled water.
But drying the sponge
by compression in the vice so damaged the sponge that only
3 runs were practical.
A third sponge was prepared with the same dimensions as the previous two. However, this sponge was not prepared by rinsing with saline solution, and the experiment
was repeated a total of 6 times despite the extreme deterioration of the sponge.
For comparison of the effect of dielectric constant, the apparatus was rearranged
so that the axis of the coil was vertical. A 3 inch square of 0.1 inch thick plexiglass was glued to the bottom end. This rearrangement necessitated a minor readjustment of the impedance matching network. After readjustment, and a 2 minute wait to insure stability, the coil form was filled to the top with distilled sodium free water.
At this time the forward and reflected voltage indications were recorded. The coil
form and water were then placed in a freezer for 9 hours. Upon removal from the
freezer,
the coil was reattached to the circuit and the SWR again determined. However, condensation soon covered the coil and connections. The coil form was warmed with a hot air gun until the ice could be pushed out in one piece. The ice was kept in the freezer until the test coil returned to room temperature (26.8 o C) as indicated by digital thermometer.
At this time the cylindrical block of ice was removed from the freezer and place in the coil. The forward and reverse readings were recorded immediately.
Results
Raw data were entered into a computer spreadsheet for calculation of SWR and wet mass (sponge mass at beginning of trial plus
number of cc's added.) The spreadsheet output was used to manually enter data coordinates into AutoCad v2.18 for creation of
the plots. Lotus 1-2-3 was used to perform linear regression on data obtained
from trials using distilled sodium free water. A printout of the reqressionis included in the appendix. The formula
calculated for aline was;
SWR = (0.2403329)(wet mass) + 0.1603431 (4)
Standard Error of Y estimate = 0.3235442
R 2 = 0.9380692
Total number of observations = 211
Standard Error of Coefficient= 0.0042714
From this the X intercept is calculated by setting SWR = 1
in equation 4 (No reflected power gives a ratio of 1).
1=0.2403329 x (wet mass) +0.1603431
1-0.1603431 = 0.2403329 x (wet mass)
3.4937 = mass
SWR calculated from data for all trials using sponges were plotted. After graphing
results of the experiments with 0.9% saline solution, the relationships were obviously
non-linear so no statistical analysis were performed on these data. Results of the
water versus ice comparison were tabulated.
Description of Graphs
The following are descriptions of the data presented in graphical and tabular form. A discussion of the results is found in the following section. The dependent variable is represented by the horizontal axis. In each graph, this term is expressed as
total wet mass of the sponge. Because the sponge did not contain the same amount
of water at the beginning of each run, plotting volume of water added versus SWR
would not be appropriate. Although water content measurements are usually expressed
as a percent of total mass, the investigation here is concerned with the relationship
between water
and SWR.
Figure 4 is a plot showing voltage measured at the output of the directional coupler
for the forward and reverse directions, and SWR calculated from these measurements
for the first trial run using distilled sodium free water. Voltage is read from
the left vertical axis and SWR is read on the right vertical axis. The horizontal axis indicates
volume of water added to the sponge.
Figure 5 is a plot of SWR calculated from data obtained using distilled sodium free water. Each circle represents SWR calculation for one data point. Data from all 12 trial runs using distilled sodium free water are plotted. The X-axis is the wet
mass of the sponge calculated as the sum of the mass before addition of water, plus
the number of cc's water added. The Y-axis of the plot shows the SWR calculated
from reflected and forward signal readings on the digital voltmeter.
Figure 6 once again shows all data points obtained using distilled sodium free water. Also shown is the prediction line determined by linear regression performed by Lotus1-2-3
computer program. In Figure 7 straight lines have been added to enclose all data points. The upper boundary is one line. The lower boundary was created with two
lines
intersecting at 13.5 grams. These boundary lines are shown in Figure 8. Projection lines have been added to show what values of total wet mass of the sponge can produce
an SWR of 2.0 and 4.5 respectively.
Figure 9 is presented in the same manner as Figure 7. For this graph however, data
are plotted only for trials 1,5, and 12. Data points are connected by lines to illustrate
progression
of each trial.
Figure 10 shows SWR versus wet sponge mass as calculated from data collected using 0.9% saline solution. This is plotted in the same manner as Figure 6 although note the change in scale for SWR. All three trial runs are shown. Here, in Figure 11,
the same data as Figure 10 are used to plot wet mass versus the natural logarithm of
SWR.
Figure 12 provides for comparison of data from distilled sodium free water and 0.9% saline solution. Scales are the same as the Figure 10, with expansion of the mass axis allowing for plotting of one complete trial of each fluid.
Figure 13 presents SWR calculated from data obtained using 0.9% saline solution and the unprepared sponge. Trial sequence numbers identify individual trials for comparison.
Table 1 shows the signal samples and calculated SWR obtained when the apparatus
was rearranged for measurement of distilled sodium free water and this same water
after freezing. Only the first readings obtained for the ice are presented, though
the SWR increased rapidly as the ice melted.
Table 1
Comparison of Ice and Distilled WaterSample Reflected Forward SWR
Distilled Water 2.432 V 2.616 V 27.4Ice 1.878 V 2.290 V 10.1
Discussion of Results
Studying Figure 4 illustrates the principles of the SWR method. First consider
the graph of the reflected voltage versus water added to the sponge. The impedance
matching network could not be adjusted to provide a perfect match, so that even
when the coil was empty the reflected signal reading was 12 mV. With addition of water to the sponge,reflected
signal indication increased. Next observe the forward
reading. Although the transmitter output level was maintained by automatic internal
circuitry, the indication of forward power was not constant. This is due to the
change in impedance at the point of measurement. The impedance of the line at any
point is a function of the characteristic impedance of the line, distance from the
load, and the impedance of the load. With constant power travelling in the transmission
line, an increase in the magnitude of the impedance results in an increase in the
magnitude of the voltage of the signal.
Next note the graph of SWR calculated from the observations. The SWR line is straighter than either the forward or reflected curves. This illustrates that use of either
reflected or forward voltage reading alone would not be as meaningful as SWR. In addition, determination of reflected signal sample alone would give erroneous results,
were
true forward power to change. Ideally, SWR is independent of power level. However, non-linearity of the directional coupler diodes may cause results to vary with changes
in forward power level. The extent of this effect was not investigated.
By observing the plot of all SWR data points calculated from all twelve trials with distilled sodium free water, shown in Figure 5, a distinct relationship becomes apparent.Within
the range of water content tested, there appears tobe a relationship of a linear nature. Figure 6 compares the linear regression line to the SWR calculated
from observed data. Overall, a straight line appears to fit fairly well. However,
note from this graph the discrepancy between the prediction line intercept and some
observed lower values. The
prediction line intercept implies that if all water were
removed from the sponge its mass would be 3.49 grams. Massof the sponge before beginning the trials, at 2.35 grams, was nearly one-third lower.
Returning to the premise that the SWR method can be a tool for prediction of water
content, the point of interest is the accuracy. As an investigation of accuracy, lines were found that contain all data points of observations with distilled sodium free water. These lines, shown with data points in Figure 7, are reproduced in Figure 8. As an example, an SWR measurement of 4.5:1 could have resulted from total wet sponge mass from less than 15 grams to nearly 21. A calculation of water content
would involve measurement of total mass, then determination of water content as a percent of this. This example SWR measurement could have resulted from wet sponge mass differences of approximately
6 grams, which is a range of 30 %. A second example
is illustrated choosing an SWR of 2:1 and once again inspecting the X axis. An SWR
of 2:1 could have resulted from
sponge wet masses from just under 6 to approximately
9.5 grams. This is a +/- 1.75 gram range from a value of 7.75 grams, a tolerance of +/- 23%.
The nature of the variance of the plotted SWR values may lead to its identification and reduction. Figure 9 plots data from three individual trials. Note how well trials 5 and 12 fit a smooth curve. This was typical of the majority of trial runs. Trial
1 has been included to show its abrupt change in slope at approximately 8 grams.
The cause of difference in slope between runs is not known, nor is it understood. Variance in readings due to inconsistent placement of the carrier within the coil
would be expected, if significant, to appear as deviations from aline or smooth curve on each trial. Inconsistent distribution of water within the sponge would
be expected to exhibit a similar variance. All water used in th eexperiments came from a single one gallon container. The frequency of the transmitter is derived
from a crystal oscillator
locked synthesizer. Output level from the transmitter
is controlled, and any residual variation should not be significant as SWR depends
solely on the ratio of forward to reflected signal. However, the transmitter was
turned off between trials, as sometimes drying the sponge could take more than one half hour. Although the transmitter frequency and output are stabilized, circuit
losses in the impedance matching circuit, or perhaps within the test coil itself, may have caused heating of one or more components, causing a change in value. These temperature induced component drifts might explain the change in slope.
The results of the experiment with 0.9% saline solution shows that changes in fluid
conductivity have dramatic effects. The three trial runs shown graphically in Figure10
exhibit an very non-linear relationship with the wet mass of the sponge. As seen
in Figure 11, the wet mass has a more linear relationship with the natural logarithm
of SWR .However, if a straight line approximating this relationship would be quite
erroneous for low values of water. When one of the trials of saline solution is
compared to a trial of distilled sodium free water, as in Figure 12, the slope is
seen to be much steeper even for low amounts of saline solution. The rapid rate of increase in slope exhibited above 13 grams wet sponge mass becomes so steep at 14 grams, that
it appears to be asymptotic at some value slightly greater than those investigated here. Below this point, the effect of conductivity shows that the inductance
method should
be suited to applications in biology or foodprocessing.
By studying the comparison of SWR between distilled sodium free water and the saline
solution in Figure 12, one might initially conclude that this graph shows the differing
effects of dielectric constant and conductivity. But the difference seen here necessitates exclusion of such an inference. Because of the clearly demonstrated effect of increased
water conductivity, it can not be assumed that the results of the experiments using
distilled sodium free water were due to dielectric effects alone. Although distilled
water has very poor conductivity, its value is unknown for the water used in these experiments. Furthermore, the conductivity may have increased upon contact and reaction
with the
molecules of the sponge.
The water versus ice comparison was performed in an attempt to answer the conductivity vs. dielectric question. The coil, when filled with distilled sodium free water,
presented
an SWR of 27.4. After freezing the water, the SWR was initially 10, and was rising rapidly as the ice on theperiphery of the block melted in the coil form. As water has a dielectric constant of 80.37
and that of ice is reported to be 3.7 at 10 MHz,
38 this difference might have been used as a indicator of the effect
of dielectric constant
on the coil impedance. However, the ice had visible fracture lines and air bubbles. The bubbles and fractures were obviously not uniformly distributed
within the block of ice. Thus the ice was not homogeneous and these factors would
affect the conductance of the ice block as a whole. Therefore, the degree to which the dielectric properties of water affect the SWR can not be determined from this experiment.
This uncertainty does not, however, detract from the credibility of the reflected power method itself. The reflected power method would provide a relationship between
dielectric
constant, and quantity of that dielectric, in the electrostatic field of a capacitor.
The SWR method is simple. If sensitivity can be increased sufficiently, the method
could be accomplished with very simple circuitry, and only two temperature sensitive
components. Thus, cost, reliability and stability could be significantly better than current methods.
Future Work
The reflected power method could be applied to a capacitor type system. As much experience has been gained in these type detectors, perhaps greater accuracy and range could
be perfected. The capacitance method may be necessary for moisture measurements in situations where conductivity of the fluid is not constant, or where its value
is very low.
In its current configuration, this circuit required useof one switch and one meter.
The two desired measurements could be reduced to one by developing electronic circuitry
to output a signal corresponding to SWR directly. Perhaps the two individual signals could be converted to digital signals, then mathematically corrected for directional
coupler
diode non-linearity. This would eliminate the need for calculations and provide a single signal suitable for closed loop process control of a product manufacture.
Accuracy of the directional coupler could also be improved which may lead to improved repeatability.
Also,coil parameters may be adjusted for optimum performance.
Proper design of the coil would require only a single variable capacitor to obtain the
empty coil impedance match. Different frequencies might improve the range of the
instrument. Measurement of intrusion by other fluids,perhaps with higher conductivity, also may be informative. Finally,
with proper coil dimensions, or use of a capacitor
as the test chamber, this test system might be usable for measurements of fluid volume in small animals.
The great difference between curves for distilled sodium free water and saline solution warrant further investigation. A series of experiments using incremental salinities
might show possible application of this technique to conductivity measurements of fluids. Current methods for non-contact measurement of fluid conductivity requires
theuse of two toroidal coils. Mass of water in a test tube can be measured accurately and this information combined with
SWR could determine conductivity.
Perhaps most important work would be to increase the detector sensitivity. If the
detection circuit sensitivity can be increased sufficiently, the circuit could utilize low power, single chip oscillators for a signal source. The apparatus used for this
investigation required power levels on the order of one watt. The cost of such signal sources would negate the advantages of the reflected power method.
Secondly, if the power requirements were to be reduced 20dB, this would enable the production of
a truly portable battery powered circuit. Before systems utilizing this method
can be mass produced, the radiation levels must be reduced by power reduction and
proper shielding to comply with Federal Communications Commission guidelines for
incidental
radiators of electromagnetic radiation.
Citations
1. Clark, Wm. L., Anthony Nudo and Peter Yin. TheDetermination of Water in Storable
RocketPropellants. A Comparison of Several AnalyticalTechniques . Humidity and Moisture.
Measurement and Control in Science and Industry. 1965 ReinholdPublishing New York.
volume 4, page 55-61
2. Besterfield, Dale Quality Control. 2nd edition.1986 Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
3. Nondestructive Evaluation; Application to Materials
Processing. Conference Proceedings American Society
of Metals Oct 3-4, 1983 Publishers Choice Book Mfg.Co. Mars, Pennsylvania 1984 forward, page v
4. Groover, Mikell P. Automation, Production Systems
and Computer Integrated Manufacturing Prentice Hall1987
5. De Castro, Elda Hygrometric Method of Measuring Moisture Contents in Porous Materials.
Humidity and Moisture. Measurement and Control in Science and Industry.
1965 Reinhold Publishing New York. volume
4, pages 7-12
6. Bouyoucos, George John. Plaster of Paris Block
Electrical Measuring Unit for Making a Continuous
Measurement of Soil Moisture under Field Conditions. Humidity
and Moisture. Measurement and Control in Science and Industry. 1965 Reinhold
Publishing New
York. volume 4 pages 105-112
7. Richards, L.A. A Thermocouple Psychrometer for
Measuring the Relative Vapor Pressure of Water in
Liquids or Porous Materials. Humidity and Moisture. Measurement
and Control in Science and Industry. 1965 Reinhold Publishing New York. volume
4, pages
13-17
8. Vos, B.H. Non-steady-state Method for the
Determination of Moisture Content in Structures. Humidity and Moisture. Measurement and Control in Science
and Industry. 1965 Reinhold Publishing New
York. volume 4, pages 35-47
9. Clark, Wm. L., Anthony Nudo and Peter Yin. The Determination of Water in Storable
Rocket Propellants. A Comparison of Several Analytical Techniques . Humidity and
Moisture. Measurement and Control in Science and Industry. 1965 Reinhold Publishing
New York. volume 4, page 55-61
10. Geary, P J; Measurement of Moisture in Solids. A survey based on Scientific
and Technical Literature. 1970 Chiselhurst: Sira Institute
11. Benry, Ronald M. Is That Wood Dry Enough? Popular
Science July 1971 page 88
12. Nyboer, J. Electrical Impedance Plethysmography
Springfield, Il: CC Thomas, 1970 2nd edition
13. Lukaski Henry C. et al. Assessment of fat-free mass
using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the
human body. The American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition 41: April 85 pp 810-817
14. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 53rd edition 1972-1973 The Chemical Rubber
Company, Cleveland,
Ohio page F-75
15. ARRL Handbook 1988 . American Radio Relay League.
Newington, Connecticut, page 2-13
16. Geary, P J; Measurement of Moisture in Solids. A survey based on Scientific
and Technical Literature. 1970 Chiselhurst: Sira Institute
17. Leroy, R.P. Moisture Measurements by High-frequency Currents. Humidity and Moisture.
Measurement and Control in Science and Industry. 1965 Reinhold Publishing
New York. volume 4, page 135-140
18. Geary, P J Measurement of Moisture in Solids. A survey based on Scientific and
Technical Literature. 1970 Chiselhurst: Sira Institute page 19
19. Ground Moisture Meter Invented by J. Fletcher
Business Week May 15, 1948 page 69.
20. Fletcher, Joel E. The Use of Capacitance Methods
for Determining Quantities of Materials in Mixtures. Humidity and Moisture. Measurement and Control in
Science and Industry. 1965 Reinhold Publishing New
York. volume 4 page 113
21. Outwater, John O. A Portable Electronic Moisture
Detector for reinforced Plastics and Its Application . Humidity and Moisture. Measurement and Control in Science
and Industry. 1965 Reinhold
Publishing New York. volume 4, pages 99-104
22. Presta, Elio and Karen Segal, Bernard Gutin, Gail G. Harrison, Theodore B. Van
Itallie. Comparison in Man of Total Body Electrical Conductivity and Lean Body Mass
Derived from Body Density: Validation of a New Body Composition Method. Metabolism
Vol 32 No. 5 (May 1983)
23. Tarjan, P.P., and McFee, R.: Electrodeless
Measurements of the Effective Resistivity of the
Human Torso and Head by Magnetic Induction. I.E.E.E .
Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering ,
15:266-288, 1968
24. The pH and Conductivity Handbook vol 27 Omega Engineering Inc., Stamford Connecticut.
page G-3
25. The pH and Conductivity Handbook vol 27 Omega Engineering Inc., Stamford Connecticut.
page G-3
26. Nyboer, J. Electrical Impedance Plethysmography CC
Thomas, Springfield, Il. 1970 2nd edition page
60-61
27. Halsted, J.B. Aqueous Dielectrics Halsted Press,
New York 1973 page 251
28. Geary, P J MSc Measurement of Moisture in Solids. A survey based on Scientific
and Technical Literature. page 20. 1970 Chiselhurst: Sira Institute
29. James, W.L., You-Hsin Yen, and R.J. King: A
Microwave Method for Measuring Moisture Content,
Density, and Grain Angle of Wood . United States
Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Research Note
FPL-0250 March 1985
30. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 53rd edition 1972-1973 The Chemical Rubber
Company, Cleveland,
Ohio page E-43
31. Leroy, R.P. Moisture Measurements by High-frequency Currents. Humidity and Moisture.
Measurement and Control in Science and Industry. 1965 Reinhold Publishing
New York. volume 4, page 135-140
32. Sinnema, William Electronic Transmission Technology.
2nd edition 1988 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs,
N.J.
33. ARRL Handbook 1988 . American Radio Relay League.
Newington, Connecticut, page 16-2
34. ARRL Handbook 1988 . American Radio Relay League.
Newington, Connecticut, page 25-14
35. Reference Data for Engineers: Radio, Electronic,
Computer and Communications. 7th edition 1986 Howard
W. Sams, Indianapolis
36. ARRL Handbook 1988 . American Radio Relay League.
Newington, Connecticut 06111
37. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 53rd edition 1972-1973 The Chemical Rubber
Company, Cleveland,
Ohio page F-138
38. Dielectric Materials and Applications 1954
Technology Press of M.I.T. and John Wiley & Sons.
New York page 301
39. Presta, Elio and Karen Segal, Bernard Gutin, Gail G. Harrison, Theodore B. Van
Itallie. Comparison in Man of Total Body Electrical Conductivity and Lean Body Mass
Derived from Body Density: Validation of a New Body Composition Method. Metabolism
Vol 32 No. 5 (May 1983)
VITA
Graduate School Southern Illinois University
Parkland College, Champaign, Illinois; Associate of Applied Science Communications-Broadcast
Technology
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale; Bachelor of Science Engineering
Technology
Thesis Title:
Water Content Measurement by Reflected Power Method
Major Professor: Dr. Jefferson F. Lindsey III K5AAK
|